Speaker summary
43% 23 analyzed articles/videos 718.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congress results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 1,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 718.5 analyzed words across 23 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,858 of 28,364 speakers). This Congress is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Congress
Speaker details
Total words: 718.5
Content count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score23 analyzed videos718.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 19.6% 19.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Composition/Division: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst