CBS News19%

DOJ says it's no longer illegal to download TikTok on federal devices 43%

By Joe Walsh17%

7/18/2026, 3:53:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 653 faulty-reasoning hits from 599 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.5% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,584 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the article peer group.

The Justice Department determined this week a federal law banning TikTok from government devices no longer applies to the social video app. 
The written opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel  an office that offers legal advice to the executive branch  was issued six months after TikTok's U.S.-based operations were shifted to a new joint venture mostly made up of American investors. 
The social network's prior ownership by Beijing-based ByteDance, which still holds a minority stake, had drawn years of national security concerns and caused TikTok to face a looming nationwide ban. 
In late 2022, Congress passed bipartisan legislation that required executive branch agencies to remove TikTok from federal devices. 
It also covered "any successor application or service developed or provided by ByteDance Limited or an entity owned by ByteDance Limited." 
But on Thursday, the Justice Department argued that law no longer applies to the version of TikTok currently available in the U.S. 
In a 12-page opinion addressed to the deputy counsel to the president, the Office of Legal Counsel said that "Congress banned only the version of TikTok that shares the same problematic ownership features." 
It's still up to individual federal agencies to decide whether to allow TikTok, and agencies can still "independently decide to ban the downloading of TikTok to government devices for workforce management reasons, such as promoting employee productivity." 
The opinion notes at one point: "We understand you have since instructed that employees of Executive Branch agencies may download TikTok onto their official devices, subject to the agency's discretion and consistent with all applicable workplace policies." 
The White House referred a request for comment to the Justice Department. 
CBS News has reached out to TikTok for comment. 
The ban on downloading TikTok to government-owned devices was driven by fears that data from a ByteDance-owned social media app could end up in the hands of the Chinese government  a worry TikTok had long insisted was unwarranted. 
In 2024, Congress went further, passing legislation that would effectively ban TikTok from the United States altogether unless ByteDance divested from the app's U.S. operations by January 2025. 
The law took effect a day before President Trump's inauguration. 
However, Mr. 
Trump  who came out against banning TikTok despite supporting a ban in his first term  directed the Justice Department not to enforce the ban, saying he was working on a deal to shift ownership. 
A deal that emerged last year and was finalized in January 2026 saw a group of mostly U.S.-based investors take a majority stake in the version of TikTok available to Americans. 
ByteDance retained 19.9% of the venture, just under the law's 20% cap. 
One of the new investors is Oracle, a tech company chaired by Larry Ellison. 
His son David Ellison is CEO of Paramount, a Skydance corporation, which is the parent company of CBS News. 
The new joint venture  known as TikTok U.S. 
Data Security, or TikTok USDS  promised intense cybersecurity controls. 
It said it would retrain the social media platform's recommendation algorithm using data from American users, and Oracle would "review and validate source code on an ongoing basis." 
The deal drew some scrutiny from lawmakers who pressed for evidence that it would address the national security concerns that led Congress to pass a ban. 
Two investors in competing tech firms Alphabet and Meta also sued the federal government, arguing the deal did not comply with the law. 
The federal government has asked for the case to be dismissed. 
It is still pending. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.0%Joe Walsh: 2.4%CBS Miami: 2.2%Confirmation Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.4%CBS Miami: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Joe Walsh: 2.0%CBS Miami: 2.5%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 3.2%Joe Walsh: 0.5%CBS Miami: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.2%This article: 5.2%Joe Walsh: 0.3%CBS Miami: 0.5%Hindsight Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 2.6%CBS Miami: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Joe Walsh: 7.7%CBS Miami: 6.1%Framing Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.2%CBS Miami: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.2%Joe Walsh: 0.4%CBS Miami: 0.6%Status Quo Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Joe Walsh: 1.6%CBS Miami: 1.9%Optimism Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 1.0%CBS Miami: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Joe Walsh: 6.5%CBS Miami: 6.7%Negativity Bias15.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 2.4%CBS Miami: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.7%CBS Miami: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.0%Joe Walsh: 0.3%CBS Miami: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 1.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Joe Walsh: 0.6%CBS Miami: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias6.5%This article: 2.3%Joe Walsh: 0.5%CBS Miami: 1.6%Halo Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.0%Joe Walsh: 1.5%CBS Miami: 1.1%Recency Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 1.6%CBS Miami: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.5%CBS Miami: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.2%Joe Walsh: 4.1%CBS Miami: 4.3%Appeal to Authority7.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 1.7%CBS Miami: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.6%CBS Miami: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 2.7%CBS Miami: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.2%CBS Miami: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.3%CBS Miami: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.5%Joe Walsh: 5.6%CBS Miami: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion6.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 1.0%CBS Miami: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.3%Joe Walsh: 2.9%CBS Miami: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.3%CBS Miami: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.5%CBS Miami: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.8%CBS Miami: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.7%Joe Walsh: 1.5%CBS Miami: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Joe Walsh: 2.4%CBS Miami: 2.0%Unattributed Quote1.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 1.2%CBS Miami: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 1.0%CBS Miami: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.5%CBS Miami: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.2%CBS Miami: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Walsh: 0.1%CBS Miami: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

599 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers54%attributed speech273writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Department • 22 words • 0.0% coverageOffice of Legal Counsel • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageCongress • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Department • 22 words • 0.0% coverageOffice of Legal Counsel • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageOffice of Legal Counsel • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCBS News • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageCongress • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageOracle • 28 words • 0.0% coveragelawmakers • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coveragefederal government • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
114 attributed words35% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Office of Legal Counsel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.