Topic summary
⁠97%4 analyzed articles/videos1,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiktok results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,233 hits. Analysis detected 12,171 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,023 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,412 of 16,412 topics). This Tiktok is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Tiktok
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,023
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos