Author summary
65%5 analyzed articles/videos733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jess Weatherbed results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,076 hits. Analysis detected 5,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,052 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,535 of 6,628 authors). This Jess Weatherbed is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Jess Weatherbed
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
62%Jess Weatherbed (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,052
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 21.3%21.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate