Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Heather A. Conley results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 817 hits. Analysis detected 6,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,171 authors). This Heather A. Conley is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Heather A. Conley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Heather A. Conley (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 7,056
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.6%6.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 11.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos