Speaker summary
40% 38 analyzed articles/videos 3,237.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clarence Thomas results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 524 hits . Analysis detected 4,335.787 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,237.333 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,266 of 28,364 speakers). This Clarence Thomas is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Clarence Thomas
Speaker details
Total words: 3,237.333
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score38 analyzed videos3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst