Author summary
62%1 analyzed article/video1,730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garnet Henderson results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Slippery Slope, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 500 hits. Analysis detected 5,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,753 of 6,359 authors). This Garnet Henderson is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Garnet Henderson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Garnet Henderson (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,190
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos