BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 778 faulty-reasoning hits from 250 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,364 of 21,164 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the article peer group.

The president’s revenge machine may soon kick into overdrive. 
Can Platner’s platform live on without him as the candidate? 
Democrats need to learn this lesson. 
An ICE agent just shot and killed a man in Houston. 
The new system would let plutocrats like Elon Musk corrupt the state judiciary. 
Test your wits on the Slate Quiz for July 8, 2026. 
There is one loud lesson to be found in this term’s rulings. 
The World Cup vibes have officially curdled. 
The Maine Democrat may have met a scandal he can’t beat. 
Who could replace Graham Platner? 
Only Clarence Thomas went further in his bigotry. 
“If you think about it for five seconds, it’s a pretty laughable proposition.” 
The candidate has been credibly accused of sexual assault. 
Pete Buttigieg's nightmare is far too common. 
Test your wits on the Slate Quiz for July 7, 2026. 
When I began contacting the survivors, they thought I was a prank caller. 
How many times can you explode Alex Jones? 
Turns out, a lot. 
Now the whole world is getting a lesson in presidential coercion. 
Donald Trump has another weapon he can wield on his way out the door. 
There is no principled way to square these blockbuster opinions. 
Congress used to overturn several opinions practically every term. 
Test your wits on the Slate Quiz for July 6, 2026. 
Conservatives tend to blame women for declining fertility. 
They’re wrong. 
How a one-time 5 percent billionaire tax is shaking up 2028. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.2%Slate: 4.3%Confirmation Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Slate: 3.2%Availability Heuristic16.0%This article: 5.2%Slate: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic5.2%This article: 3.6%Slate: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.6%This article: 6.0%Slate: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias6.0%This article: 4.4%Slate: 5.9%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.0%Slate: 1.8%Pessimism Bias22.0%This article: 47.6%Slate: 9.8%Negativity Bias47.6%This article: 5.2%Slate: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Slate: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Slate: 1.5%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 3.2%Slate: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Slate: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Slate: 1.9%Ad Hominem5.2%This article: 0.0%Slate: 1.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 2.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 10.0%Slate: 1.8%False Dilemma10.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 1.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.4%Slate: 7.9%Hasty Generalization24.4%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 31.6%Slate: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion31.6%This article: 7.2%Slate: 1.2%Begging the Question7.2%This article: 4.4%Slate: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.4%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.4%Slate: 0.4%Composition/Division4.4%This article: 8.8%Slate: 3.3%Anecdotal8.8%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 21.2%Slate: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)21.2%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Slate: 1.4%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 8.0%Slate: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection8.0%This article: 23.6%Slate: 19.7%Biased Writer Voice23.6%This article: 2.4%Slate: 2.4%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 14.0%Slate: 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Slate: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Slate: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.2%

250 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers32%attributed speech169writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Slate Magazine • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageElon Musk • 13 words • 100.0% coverageSlate Quiz • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageClarence Thomas • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 7 words • 100.0% coverageSlate Quiz • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSlate Quiz • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Elon Musk

100%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words16% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+95.3 ptsWriter: 4.7%Elon Musk: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-26.0 ptsWriter: 26.0%Elon Musk: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-11.8 ptsWriter: 11.8%Elon Musk: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Elon Musk: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Elon Musk: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.