Speaker summary
â 54% 13 analyzed articles/videos 1,298.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Grassley results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 245.655 hits . Analysis detected 2,705.789 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,298.333 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of â 3% (27,686 of 28,364 speakers). This Chuck Grassley is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Chuck Grassley
Speaker details
Total words: 1,298.333
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 4.9% BS Score13 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 7.5% Tu Quoque: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst