Author summary
⁠98%2 analyzed articles/videos2,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joy Pullmann results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 4,954 hits. Analysis detected 32,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,108 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (927 of 6,628 authors). This Joy Pullmann is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Joy Pullmann
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠86%Joy Pullmann (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,108
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
5.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 44.6%44.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 44.2%44.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 27.5%27.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.8%19.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 44.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 44.2%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 27.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos