Speaker summary
53%9 analyzed articles/videos349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chellie Pingree results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 802.109 faulty-reasoning hits from 349 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,106 of 28,364 speakers). This Chellie Pingree is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.5% percentile
10.0% BS Score9 analyzed videos349 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate