Speaker summary
54% 18 analyzed articles/videos 1,423.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cara Spencer results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 337.968 hits . Analysis detected 3,075.738 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,423.333 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,446 of 26,920 speakers). This Cara Spencer is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Cara Spencer
Speaker details
Total words: 1,423.333
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score18 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst