Author summary
0% 40 analyzed articles/videos 15,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Lippmann results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 6,149 hits . Analysis detected 60,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 80,501 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,452 of 6,171 authors). This Rachel Lippmann is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Rachel Lippmann
Author details
Total words: 80,501
Article count: 40
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score40 analyzed articles80.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst