STLPR0%

St. Louis to implement summer curfew for teens downtown 38%

By Rachel Lippmann0%

7/1/2026, 6:20:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 672 faulty-reasoning hits from 324 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.8% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,745 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the article peer group.

The City of St. 
Louis will implement a summer curfew for teens starting on Friday. 
Officials announced Wednesday that from Friday through Sept. 8, those 17 and under cannot be in the Downtown and Downtown West neighborhoods from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. unless they are accompanied by an adult. 
The curfew will not apply to teens traveling to or from work, houses of worship or a sanctioned event. 
“This curfew will make sure that teens taking part in the celebrations stay with trusted adults, and that we have another tool to keep both juveniles and our community safe, both this holiday weekend and the rest of the summer,” Mayor Cara Spencer said in a statement. 
The mayor implemented a similar curfew in the downtown area in March in response to a chaotic weekend during spring break. 
She also put one in place in the Grove during Pride celebrations last weekend, when six juveniles were detained. 
One was carrying a firearm, police said. 
Kids caught out after curfew during the July Fourth weekend will be taken to a reunification center, where nonprofits will help connect them to services. 
It’s not clear what assistance will be available for teens who violate curfew during the rest of the summer. 
Over the Independence Day holiday last year, the city focused its attention on fireworks and weapons violations. 
Teenagers who were caught with guns or fireworks were taken to a reunification center, and parents were given citations for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. 
“But this year, we also have the curfew on top of that, which I think is a great tool to help us really get ahead of young people and really set the tone that we want people to be safe and we want them to be safe,” St. 
Louis Police Chief Robert Tracy said Wednesday at a meeting of the Board of Police Commissioners. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 2.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Rachel Lippmann: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Rachel Lippmann: 7.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 29.3%Rachel Lippmann: 4.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias29.3%This article: 5.9%Rachel Lippmann: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias5.9%This article: 10.5%Rachel Lippmann: 7.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias10.5%This article: 14.8%Rachel Lippmann: 3.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias14.8%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Rachel Lippmann: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.5%Rachel Lippmann: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority14.5%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 2.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.8%Rachel Lippmann: 7.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion14.8%This article: 14.5%Rachel Lippmann: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question14.5%This article: 6.5%Rachel Lippmann: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.5%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 8.3%Rachel Lippmann: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division8.3%This article: 8.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal8.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.4%Rachel Lippmann: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote19.4%This article: 14.5%Rachel Lippmann: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection14.5%This article: 29.3%Rachel Lippmann: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice29.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Lippmann: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

324 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers22%attributed speech254writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Cara Spencer • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragepolice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageLouis Police Chief Robert Tracy • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mayor Cara Spencer

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words67% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mayor Cara Spencer: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mayor Cara Spencer: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+81.1 ptsWriter: 18.9%Mayor Cara Spencer: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.