Author summary
59% 26 analyzed articles/videos 21,354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kavahn Mansouri results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 8,204 hits . Analysis detected 72,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 87,257 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,562 of 6,427 authors). This Kavahn Mansouri is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Kavahn Mansouri
Author details
Total words: 87,257
Article count: 26
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score26 analyzed articles87.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst