Speaker summary
33%40 analyzed articles/videos1,362.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brett Kavanaugh results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 3,184.852 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,362.667 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,873 of 28,364 speakers). This Brett Kavanaugh is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score40 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 0.2%0.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate