Speaker summary
58% 8 analyzed articles/videos 415.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Clinton results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Quote-first Misdirection , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 207 hits . Analysis detected 959.122 faulty-reasoning hits from 415.667 analyzed words across 8 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,312 of 27,545 speakers). This Bill Clinton is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Bill Clinton
Speaker details
Total words: 415.667
Content count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 10.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos415.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 31.8% 31.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst