Fox News98%

JUST IN: Chaotic scene ERUPTS on House floor 69%

6/4/2026, 12:30:23 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 363 hits. Analysis detected 3,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 935 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.4% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,778 of 21,886 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the video peer group.

Here to discuss is Dan Bonino, Fox News contributor and former FBI deputy 
director. Dan um what's more important here? 
Hamo's past with the blind shake or the fact that the voters apparently did not care. 
>> You know, it's really stunning how how we got here. 
You know, like I was saying the other day, I I kind of miss the good oldfashioned political scandals of like a binder full of women's resumes or something. 
Now we've got a guy who was I'm just trying to process this was a character witness for the blind shake 
who wanted to blow up the towers so they would collapse. 
I mean the carnage as if it wasn't enough. 
People forget because of what happened on 911. 
You know the original attacks where you know this 
this was going to be a catastrophe was designed to be as bad as 9/11. 
You know Laura there are a lot of things this 
this guy could have done. There are a lot of things Graham Platner could have 
done in his life. I mean, I hear he's an oyster farmer and his mom is his client 
or whatever. Who knows? He's while he's running against the oligarchy. But this is not the thing for you. 
Okay? These are things in in political leadership that are disqualifying. The Nazi 
Stormtrooper tattoo, you know, when your CV has on it, you know, line three 
character witness for one of the world's most prominent terrorists. uh when like these are the kind of things. It's like 
applying for like a job as a bank teller with like six FBI convictions for bank robbery. 
You can do a lot of things. 
Redeem yourself with Jesus. He saves. 
But political leadership is not your thing. And really shame on the voters 
for picking these guys. You know, we we clean up our mess. Now it's time for them to clean up theirs. 
>> Well, immigration matters, right? 
We have we have a lot of new voters in the United States from diverse backgrounds. 
A lot of new Muslim voters. Republicans said we need to welcome them with open arms from places like Afghanistan and Syria uh and even Iraq, Pakistan. 
And you know, I don't know what the breakdown was last night, but I bet it tells a tale. 
Now, Dan, uh, we got to get to this because a chaotic scene just broke out on the House floor moments right before the show between Congressman Max Miller of Ohio and Rashida Tl. 
>> Hezbollah is a terrorist organization, 
the gentle lady from Michigan, and its members are butchers that you like to, 
you know, hang out with to a certain extent. You advocate for terrorists on a daily basis. 
>> The house will be in order. advocate for a terrorist regime every single day. 
>> That is a direct attack on my character. 
I please request the words down 
>> was Congressman Miller being unfair to 
Congresswoman Cla. Dan 
>> unfair. I mean, these are the people who have uh painted Donald Trump as a Nazi 
while they're running a candidate who has an actual Nazi insignia using a dermal ink inside his chest. 
I mean, these people deserve everything they get. 
You know, David Harris wrote a book a long time ago, Unholy Alliance, how 
the left will ally with anyone as long as they think that that allegiance will get them power and get them power back. 
This is nothing more. Whether it's open borders, their allegiance with the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, these terror groups, they don't care. I can't say to America in strong enough terms, this modern Democrat party, there will be no DLC in the 1980s to come and save you 
with this moderate Bill Clinton southern governor thing. 
Your party is lost. It's been hijacked by terrorists, lunatics, 
open bar, open border, defund the police crazies. 
And if you want your country to go up in flames and be a national security nightmare, that's the party for 
you. I'm not telling you the Republicans out there, we don't have issues that we're the solution to every problem. But the cause, listen to me, the cause of all your problems are the Democrats. 
It's an imperfect world full of imperfect choices. But if you're choosing the D, you got big problems ahead with this mly crew of zeros. 
Um, I want to flip back to what we just discussed in the previous segment, Dan, which is kind of a my modest proposal 
that the House and Senate Judiciary Committees convene uh hearings on what's going on in California with this vote count and basically just haul all the people up, factf finding, get special masters, send a report off to DOJ 
because I don't think most people realize what's going on in California. 
I mean, sticking to the Democrat narrative here, the vote counting that never ends or at least it goes on for seven days, 
>> 13 days, possibly. 
>> I I want every Yeah, I want everyone in the audience to do me a favor. Pick up your phone and and Google or go to your favorite search engine. Put in New York Times Adam Liptac, error and fraud at issue with mailin and absentee balloting vote. It's a 2012 article. This is when the New York Times used to run exposees because a lot of elderly Florida Republicans were voting by mailin and absentee and military folks who used to vote Republican. The New York Times was 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 23.7%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias23.7%This article: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias1.4%This article: 26.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic26.5%This article: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 2.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias2.0%This article: 12.0%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect12.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias11.1%This article: 31.6%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias31.6%This article: 9.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias9.2%This article: 4.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.9%This article: 8.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.2%This article: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect1.3%This article: 17.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias17.4%This article: 5.7%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect5.7%This article: 2.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias2.0%This article: 7.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem7.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.8%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority19.8%This article: 10.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma10.6%This article: 9.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope9.1%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning2.5%This article: 27.3%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization27.3%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring2.6%This article: 7.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon7.9%This article: 38.8%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion38.8%This article: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque1.0%This article: 15.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof15.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.7%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal18.7%This article: 2.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman2.0%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.7%This article: 4.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity4.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy1.8%This article: 12.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote12.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

935 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers3.3%attributed speech904writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageHezbollah • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCongresswoman Cla. • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Harris • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageBill Clinton • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 90 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bill Clinton

100%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words26% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-12.9 ptsWriter: 12.9%Bill Clinton: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.