Speaker summary
42% 6 analyzed articles/videos 825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Brouillette results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 171.504 hits . Analysis detected 984.805 faulty-reasoning hits from 825 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 2% (25,642 of 26,155 speakers). This Ashley Brouillette is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Ashley Brouillette
Speaker details
Total words: 825
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score6 analyzed videos825 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst