Author summary
62% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,242 hits . Analysis detected 8,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,041 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,267 of 6,173 authors). This Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio
Author details
Total words: 9,041
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst