Watch: Security camera video appears to show scene after ICE agent fatally shot driver ⁠63%

By Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio⁠62%

7/14/2026, 12:42:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 136 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (7,639 of 20,447 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the article peer group.

Security camera footage obtained by the Globe from a business near where an ICE agent shot and killed a man Monday in Biddeford, Maine, shows a white sedan driving aimlessly in circles in the intersection of Hill and Pool streets. 
Agents are seen opening the door and pulling a body out of the passenger’s seat. 
The body of the appears lifeless as it lies on the street as agents crouch over the man. 
Then several other agents come over to the scene, hovering over the body. 
The victim was identified as Joan Sebastian Guerrero, according to a spokesman for Maine Senator Angus King. 
The shooting sparked angry protests, including at Senator Susan Collins’s local office, while authorities investigated what precipitated the violence. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 5.4%Boston Globe: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 29.4%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.4%Boston Globe: 0.9%Anchoring Bias29.4%This article: 39.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 5.2%Boston Globe: 3.3%Availability Heuristic39.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 1.4%Boston Globe: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 1.1%Boston Globe: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.5%Boston Globe: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 7.1%Boston Globe: 5.2%Framing Effect10.3%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.1%Boston Globe: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 1.0%Boston Globe: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.7%Boston Globe: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 37.5%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 13.7%Boston Globe: 7.5%Negativity Bias37.5%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.8%Boston Globe: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 7.7%Boston Globe: 4.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 2.0%Boston Globe: 1.4%Recency Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.8%Boston Globe: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.6%Boston Globe: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.5%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 5.3%Boston Globe: 3.9%Appeal to Authority12.5%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.9%Boston Globe: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 5.3%Boston Globe: 2.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 1.2%Boston Globe: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 10.8%Boston Globe: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.7%Boston Globe: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 4.5%Boston Globe: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.2%Boston Globe: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.6%Boston Globe: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.1%Boston Globe: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 8.7%Boston Globe: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 2.2%Boston Globe: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.1%Boston Globe: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.5%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 2.2%Boston Globe: 1.2%Unattributed Quote12.5%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 1.0%Boston Globe: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 39.7%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 2.8%Boston Globe: 2.1%Biased Writer Voice39.7%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.5%Boston Globe: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.8%Boston Globe: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

136 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech119writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMaine Senator Angus King • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Maine Senator Angus King: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-45.4 ptsWriter: 45.4%Maine Senator Angus King: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.