Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biddeford results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 201 hits. Analysis detected 534 faulty-reasoning hits from 544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,061 of 15,461 topics). This Biddeford is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Biddeford
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.1% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles544 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.0%37.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 9.7%9.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos