Author summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos1,819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lea Skene results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,058 hits. Analysis detected 9,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,958 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (3,588 of 6,170 authors). This Lea Skene is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Lea Skene
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠42%Lea Skene (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,958
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos