Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sabrina Shankman results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 577 hits . Analysis detected 2,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,466 of 6,170 authors). This Sabrina Shankman is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Sabrina Shankman
Author details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.9% 16.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst