Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Stoico results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 2,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,898 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,548 of 6,194 authors). This Nick Stoico is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Nick Stoico
Author details
Total words: 2,898
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst