Speaker summary
52%7 analyzed articles/videos319.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Albanese results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 163.038 hits. Analysis detected 474.992 faulty-reasoning hits from 319.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.8% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,772 of 28,364 speakers). This Anthony Albanese is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
13.8% BS Score7 analyzed videos319.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 45.6%45.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate