Middle East crisis live: US and Iran say peace deal reached but Israel rules out withdrawing from Lebanon ⁠24%

By Yohannes Lowe (now)⁠0% Tom Ambrose⁠33% Fran Singh⁠0% Kate Lamb (earlier)⁠0%

6/15/2026, 12:45:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 37 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 606 hits. Analysis detected 3,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,550 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (16,723 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the article peer group.

A Hezbollah ⁠official has told the Reuters news agency ⁠that the ⁠militant group ​has not carried out any operations ⁠since the Iran-US framework peace deal was ⁠announced yesterday, adding that ​its position ‌on the ‌ceasefire was linked ‌to Israel’s adherence to it. 
The official said Hezbollah rejects Israeli “freedom of movement” in ​Lebanon and said Iran delayed signing the deal with ⁠the US to monitor ​Israel’s adherence ​to the ​ceasefire in ​Lebanon. 
Israel has fiercely resisted Lebanon’s inclusion in the deal, where its forces have mounted a broad assault and occupied a swath of land in the south. 
The US president, Donald Trump, called for restraint on Sunday after Israel launched fresh airstrikes on the Lebanese capital of Beirut. 
Iran’s foreign ministry said on Monday that Tehran still holds “deep mistrust” of the United States despite an agreed framework aimed at ending the war. 
“Unfortunately, it must be acknowledged that Iran’s deep mistrust of the United States stems from long history of wrongdoing by American leaders,” said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei in a weekly press briefing. 
“The United States still has a long way to go before it can earn the trust of the Iranian people,” he noted, adding that the framework was “merely a step toward reducing tensions and end a war” which broke out late February. 
Iran’s stocks of enriched uranium need to be neutralised and placed under the supervision of the UN atomic agency, French president Emmanuel Macron said on Monday. 
“We will ensure that the enriched uranium capabilities that remain are properly neutralised,” Macron said after US president Donald Trump announced a deal with Iran. 
The sensitive stocks should be “either taken out, or diluted” and then looked after by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Macron said. 
A Hezbollah ⁠official has told the Reuters news agency ⁠that the ⁠militant group has not carried out any operations ⁠since the Iran-US framework peace deal was ⁠announced yesterday, adding that its position ‌on the ‌ceasefire was linked ‌to Israel’s adherence to it. 
The official said Hezbollah rejects Israeli “freedom of movement” in Lebanon and said Iran delayed signing the deal with ⁠the US to monitor Israel’s adherence to the ceasefire in Lebanon. 
Israel has fiercely resisted Lebanon’s inclusion in the deal, where its forces have mounted a broad assault and occupied a swath of land in the south. 
The US president, Donald Trump, called for restraint on Sunday after Israel launched fresh airstrikes on the Lebanese capital of Beirut. 
Pakistan, a key mediator between the US and Iran in peace talks, says it will oversee the formal signing ceremony of the framework agreement in Geneva, Switzerland, on Friday, according to Al Jazeera. 
The country’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, told the National Assembly session in Islamabad that “after three months and 16 days of unparalleled trials, the immediate and permanent cessation of military operations has been announced across all fronts, including Iran, America, and Lebanon”. 
Fury has continued to mount in India over the US’s refusal to apologise for the deaths of Indian sailors killed in strikes in the strait of Hormuz, further straining relations between the two countries as their leaders meet at the G7 summit in France this week. 
Last week, three Indian seafarers, who were working on board commercial oil tankers, were killed when the US launched missile strikes on the vessel as it sailed through the strait of Hormuz. 
The deaths were the first since the US military began in April its blockade of the strait in an attempt to squeeze Iran’s economy and push its government towards a peace deal. 
However, the seemingly blase response from the US government to the killing of the sailors has been the cause of great consternation in India. 
Headlines over the weekend simply read: “No apology from Washington.” 
The initial US government statement initially did not even make any mention of the deaths, instead just confirming that its forces had carried out a strike on a vessel in the strait that was allegedly in violation of sanctions, and which had been “uncooperative”. 
The Indian government first condemned the strikes with “strong protest” and summoned a senior US diplomat to convey that the strikes must stop. 
But as pressure over the attack continued to build in Delhi, India’s foreign minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, spoke directly to the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, sending a signal that India would not simply let the matter slide. 
You can read the full story here: 
Indian outrage over US killing of sailors mounts as leaders attend G7 summit 
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun has said he hopes the US-Iran framework deal would put a “definitive end” to the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, the Iranian backed Lebanese militant group and political party. 
In a statement issued by his office, Aoun praised the memorandum’s affirmation that “Lebanon’s security and safety are an integral part of any effort to consolidate stability in the region”. 
The Lebanese people “look forward to these understandings transforming into practical steps that put a definitive end to the cycle of violence and establish a phase of stability, security, recovery and reconstruction,” the statement added. 
Hezbollah, which operates independently from the Lebanese state, has not been a party to the negotiations between Israel and the government of Lebanon. 
Despite having been engaged in diplomacy with Lebanon, Israel was striking southern Lebanon and ordering mass evacuation orders on a near-daily basis. 
This was before the US-Iran agreement was announced yesterday. 
It is yet to be seen if the Israeli attacks, which killed many civilians and destroyed civilian infrastructure, will continue in Lebanon going forward, a red line for Iran and something that will derail peace talks with the US. 
Hezbollah had fired rockets and drones into northern Israel and against Israeli troops in southern Lebanon as the group rejected pushes for its disarmament and Israeli occupation of large areas of the south. 
Israel’s far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, on Monday denounced the deal between the US and Iran to end the Middle East war, including in Lebanon, insisting his country was not bound by it. 
“Trump’s agreement does not bind us... we are not party to this agreement. 
It does not safeguard our security,” Ben Gvir said on his Telegram channel, in what was the first reaction from an Israeli official to the deal. 
“We must not settle for anything less than the dismantling of Hezbollah. 
We must not withdraw from a single inch of territory that our soldiers have captured and cleared of terrorist infrastructure,” he said. 
Benjamin Netanyahu is at the helm of ​the most right-wing coalition in Israeli history, which includes Smotrich, an ultranationalist who has called for government reprisal attacks on Palestinians and is a leading, many would say extreme, figure in the Israeli settler movement. 
He wields a considerable influence over Netanyahu, who is running in an election that must be held by October. 
It will be the first since the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage. 
Netanyahu has repeatedly refused to take direct responsibility for the security and intelligence failings that occurred in the lead-up to the attack, which triggered the Israeli assault on Gaza, widely viewed as a genocide against the Palestinian population. 
Netanyahu had wanted to go into the election being able to boast about the fall and eradication of the Iranian regime, according to the Times of Israel, but is now reportedly trying to buy himself time and delay the election date to as late as possible after this goal failed to materialise, with the US wanting a swift end to the war and a more hardline regime calcifying in Iran. 
Israeli newspaper Hareetz has quoted the country’s defence minister, Israel Katz, as having said that “the IDF will remain in the security zones in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza – indefinitely – to defend the border and Israeli communities against jihadist elements.” 
Israel currently occupies swathes of southern Lebanon and Katz said that troops won’t withdraw from the land. 
Despite launching the war on Iran alongside the US in late February, Israel was frozen out of the Pakistan-mediated negotiations over the peace deal – and many Israeli politicians and members of the public want the IDF to continue its war on Lebanon to degrade Hezbollah’s capabilities further. 
At least 3,711 people have been killed in Israeli attacks on Lebanon since the start of the war on 2 March, according to the country’s health ministry. 
Israel’s renewed war on Lebanon was triggered in response to Hezbollah firing rockets at northern Israel after the US and Israel killed the former Iranian supreme leader in Tehran on 28 February. 
As well as killing many civilians, the Israeli assault on the country has led to the widespread demolition of homes in southern Lebanon and triggered a refugee crisis in which hundreds of thousands of people were forced to flee in response to sweeping evacuation orders often given at little or no notice. 
The United States and Iran said they reached a deal to end the Middle East war on all fronts including Lebanon, and reopen the vital strait of Hormuz, but offered little indication on the thorny question of Tehran’s nuclear programme, reports Agence France-Presse. 
Washington and Islamabad said the agreement was to be signed on Friday in Switzerland. 
But the content of the deal, which follows weeks of fraught negotiations and periodic threats from Trump of fresh hostilities unless Iran reached a deal, remained unclear. 
Iran’s Mehr news agency reported the US would release $12bn in frozen assets to Iran before the start of negotiations. 
It quoted a 14-point “memorandum of understanding” between the two nations, which it said stipulated “the release of 24 billion dollars in frozen Iranian assets during the 60? 
day negotiation period” that begins after the MoU is signed. 
The Trump administration didn’t immediately comment on the details of the agreement, which may prove contentious as the US presses its effort to end Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and deal with its stockpile of highly enriched uranium – believed to have been buried by US strikes last year. 
In an interview with the New York Times on Sunday, Trump said Washington was still negotiating whether Iran would suspend its enrichment for 20 years. 
News of the deal has sparked comment from leaders around the globe, including in France, Qatar, the UK, Turkey, Japan and Australia. 
Qatar’s foreign ministry expressed its “full support for all efforts” and initiatives aimed at enhancing regional security and stability”. 
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan stressed “the need to avoid rhetoric, provocations”, and actions that could escalate tensions in the period leading up to the signing of the agreement, and to remain vigilant against possible sabotage.” 
French President Emmanuel Macron called for “the urgent and unconditional reopening of the Strait of Hormuz,” adding that France and the UK were “ready to support”. 
British prime minister Keir Starmer said “toll-free freedom of navigation must now be restored in the Strait of Hormuz,” adding that the UK was ready “to offer support on mine clearance.” 
“It remains the UK’s firm and longstanding position that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon,” he added. 
Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese and foreign minister Penny Wong called for “continued restraint and constructive engagement”. 
“Iran must address longstanding concerns about its nuclear program and the threat it poses to international security,” they said in a joint statement. 
News of the US-Iran peace deal has been greeted by global markets with a sigh of relief. 
The strait of Hormuz – a vital maritime chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s crude oil supply transits – was effectively closed by Tehran soon after US-Israel strikes on Iran kicked off the conflict on 28 February, roiling global markets for months. 
Writing on Truth Social on his 80th birthday, President Trump said: 
“ I hereby fully authorize the toll free opening of the Strait of Hormuz, and, simultaneously herewith, authorize the immediate removal of the United States Naval blockade. 
“Ships of the World, start your engines. 
Let the oil flow!” 
Crude prices tanked as much as 5% Monday, with West Texas Intermediate approaching $80 a barrel for the first time since the start of March. 
Brent was down more than 4% at about $83.60 
Asian equities surged, led by Tokyo and Seoul, which piled on more than 5% apiece. 
Hello and welcome to our live coverage of events in the Middle East, with the US and Iran agreeing to a tentative deal to end the war. 
There are still many details to be ironed out after an MoU is expected to be signed in Geneva on Friday. 
Here is what we know so far. 
The US and Iran have reached a tentative peace deal to end the war, although many critical questions and details, including the reopening of the strait of Hormuz, and the future of Iran’s nuclear program, remain unanswered. 
The agreement was first announced by Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, who has been acting as a mediator. 
Minutes later, Donald Trump confirmed the deal, writing: “The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. 
Congratulations to all!” 
Trump subsequently said the “Great Deal” would bring peace and security to the region and claimed the strait of Hormuz would be reopened. 
“The Leaders of the Region have, for the first time, found a President who can help them achieve real Peace,” he said in a post on Truth Social. 
“With the opening of the Strait upon the signing of the Deal on Friday, for purposes of mine removal, oil will flow on both ends again for the Region, and the World!” 
In televised comments, Iran’s deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi said the agreement with the United States puts an “immediate end” to the countries’ war. 
He said the end of the war had been declared on all fronts, including Lebanon. 
However, how the strait of Hormuz will be managed seems uncertain, with Iran’s state media Mehr saying that an MoU expected to be signed in Geneva on Friday stipulates that it will be carried out under “Iranian arrangements”. 
In a call to the New York Times, Trump claimed that under the deal the strait would be “permanently toll free”. 
Trump also insisted that if Iran failed to reach a final nuclear accord with the US, he would restart military attacks on Tehran or make the US “the guardian of the Middle East” in return for 20% of the region’s revenues. 
Some, such as Republican senator Lindsey Graham have expressed concern about the differing substance from US and Iranian negotiating teams. 
Leaders in Europe, Japan, and Australia have welcomed the deal, while the UN chief António Guterres hailed it as a “critical step”. 
Asian markets have responded positively to news, with benchmarks in Tokyo and Seoul gaining more than 5% early Monday. 
Oil prices fell more than $3 a barrel. 
There has been no immediate reaction to the announcement from Israel, which has said it was not party to the planned US-Iran deal. 
The agreement ‌was sealed despite an Israeli strike on Lebanon on Sunday that drew criticism from both Iran and Trump. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.2%Yohannes Lowe (now): 2.0%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.3%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.9%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.2%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.9%This article: 1.8%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.5%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias1.8%This article: 1.7%Yohannes Lowe (now): 2.4%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 5.4%Yohannes Lowe (now): 5.2%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 1.6%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.4%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.6%This article: 1.7%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.4%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%Yohannes Lowe (now): 5.6%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias8.9%This article: 4.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.4%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 23.8%Yohannes Lowe (now): 10.5%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias23.8%This article: 1.3%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.6%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias1.3%This article: 0.9%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.2%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.9%This article: 1.6%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.4%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias1.6%This article: 1.4%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.1%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.7%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.4%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.5%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias1.8%This article: 1.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.3%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.6%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem4.7%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.5%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 3.7%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.3%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 4.2%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.0%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope4.2%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.6%Yohannes Lowe (now): 2.2%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization4.6%This article: 0.8%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.2%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.8%This article: 2.8%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.7%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon2.8%This article: 6.6%Yohannes Lowe (now): 2.8%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 5.2%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.3%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 7.3%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.8%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.3%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.9%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.2%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.9%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.4%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.9%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.4%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.9%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.2%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.9%This article: 1.8%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.5%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy1.8%This article: 9.5%Yohannes Lowe (now): 2.4%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote9.5%This article: 2.7%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.8%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 7.2%Yohannes Lowe (now): 2.6%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice7.2%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 1.5%Yohannes Lowe (now): 1.2%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Yohannes Lowe (now): 0.5%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.1%

2550 words analyzed.

Speakers

20speakers48%attributed speech1,320writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageIran’s foreign ministry • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEsmaeil Baqaei • 33 words • 0.0% coverageEsmaeil Baqaei • 42 words • 0.0% coverageEmmanuel Macron • 26 words • 0.0% coverageEmmanuel Macron • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEmmanuel Macron • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePakistan • 33 words • 0.0% coverageShehbaz Sharif • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageIndia’s foreign minister • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSubrahmanyam Jaishankar • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph Aoun • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph Aoun • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph Aoun • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageItamar Ben Gvir • 35 words • 0.0% coverageItamar Ben Gvir • 13 words • 100.0% coverageItamar Ben Gvir • 26 words • 100.0% coverageItamar Ben Gvir • 12 words • 0.0% coverageItamar Ben Gvir • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 70 words • 0.0% coverageIsrael Katz • 41 words • 100.0% coverageIsrael Katz • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageLebanon’s health ministry • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWashington and Islamabad • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMehr news agency • 20 words • 100.0% coverageMehr news agency • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMehr news agency • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageQatar’s foreign ministry • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRecep Tayyip Erdogan • 36 words • 0.0% coverageEmmanuel Macron • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKeir Starmer • 31 words • 0.0% coverageKeir Starmer • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAnthony Albanese • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAnthony Albanese • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 27 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageShehbaz Sharif • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 28 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 32 words • 0.0% coverageKazem Gharibabadi • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKazem Gharibabadi • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMehr news agency • 38 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 41 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Itamar Ben Gvir

100%flagged-word coverage
108 attributed words8.8% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice+12.2 ptsWriter: 11.9%Itamar Ben Gvir: 24.1%24.1%Quote-first Misdirection+12.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Itamar Ben Gvir: 12.0%12.0%Unattributed Quote-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Itamar Ben Gvir: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Itamar Ben Gvir: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Itamar Ben Gvir: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.