Speaker summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Itamar Ben Gvir results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 59.1% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 454 faulty-reasoning hits from 141 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,855 of 28,364 speakers). This Itamar Ben Gvir is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Itamar Ben Gvir
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
20.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos141 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 59.1%59.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.4%5.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 59.1%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos