Author summary
4% 1 analyzed article/video 881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katrina Tudlong results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 383 hits . Analysis detected 1,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,803 of 6,628 authors). This Katrina Tudlong is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Katrina Tudlong
Author details
Total words: 3,524
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst