Speaker summary
69% 36 analyzed articles/videos 2,026.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Burnham results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Begging the Question , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 297.822 hits . Analysis detected 3,872.482 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,026.333 analyzed words across 36 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,448 of 26,780 speakers). This Andy Burnham is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Andy Burnham
Speaker details
Total words: 2,026.333
Content count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score36 analyzed videos2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst