Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gareth Roberts results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Straw Man, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 855 hits. Analysis detected 5,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,794 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Gareth Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gareth Roberts
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Gareth Roberts (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,794
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 17.1%17.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 22.5%22.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Author 17.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Author 14.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos