Publication summary
ā 4% 16 analyzed articles/videos 4,749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flint Beat results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 856 hits . Analysis detected 6,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,242 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ā 20% (437 of 546 publications). This Flint Beat is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 20,242
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.0% percentile 1.0% BS Score16 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst