Flint officials say fewer than 10 properties remain in lead service line inspection process 15%

By Mitchell Kukulka4%

7/24/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Status Quo Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 305 faulty-reasoning hits from 350 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (22,327 of 26,004 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the article peer group.

FLINT, Mich.  City officials say the number of Flint properties still awaiting lead service line inspections has been reduced to fewer than 10 as they work to complete the final phase of a decade-long replacement effort, according to City of Flint Communications Coordinator Phil Hendrix. 
Hendrix said the city has taken “multiple steps” to contact the remaining property owners, including handing out fliers, knocking on doors and using deed information to track down owners who may no longer live at the designated properties. 
“We’ve had people taking phone calls all summer long, we’ve had people hanging signs on homeowners’ doorknobs,” Hendrix said. 
“We’ve tried tracking people down in every way possible so that we didn’t miss anybody." 
Hendrix said city officials estimate fewer than five properties will remain uninspected in August. 
Under the 2017 settlement agreement in "Concerned Pastors for Social Action v. 
Khouri," the city was required to inspect more than 31,000 properties to determine whether they were connected to lead service lines, Hendrix said. 
Hendrix said officials have completed inspections at nearly all of those properties. 
The inspections identified more than 11,000 lead service lines that have since been replaced. 
Flint residents looking to submit their home for inspection can contact the city’s “Get the Lead Out” initiative by phone at 810-410-1133 or email GetTheLeadOut@cityofflint.com . 
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lifted its emergency order on Flint’s drinking water in May 2025, handing off regulation responsibility to the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. 
Flint’s water system has consistently tested below action levels for lead since July 2016, EPA officials told Flint Beat. 
Flint Mayor Sheldon Neeley announced that the city filed a notice of satisfaction in U.S. 
District Court on July 9, notifying the court that city officials believe they have completed the work required under the 2017 settlement. 
The notice states that the plaintiffs did not object to the filing. 
Court records show the notice was accepted on July 13 and no further actions are scheduled in the case. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.3%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.9%Flint Beat: 1.6%Confirmation Bias16.3%This article: 4.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 1.1%Flint Beat: 0.7%Anchoring Bias4.0%This article: 4.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 1.2%Flint Beat: 1.3%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.4%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.2%Flint Beat: 0.4%Hindsight Bias5.4%This article: 4.3%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.7%Flint Beat: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 2.1%Flint Beat: 2.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.2%Flint Beat: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.6%Mitchell Kukulka: 2.2%Flint Beat: 1.2%Status Quo Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.1%Flint Beat: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.6%Mitchell Kukulka: 2.4%Flint Beat: 3.9%Optimism Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 1.4%Flint Beat: 0.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 2.6%Flint Beat: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.4%Flint Beat: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.1%Flint Beat: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.4%Mitchell Kukulka: 2.0%Flint Beat: 2.6%Appeal to Authority3.4%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.4%Flint Beat: 1.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.3%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.2%Flint Beat: 0.2%Begging the Question6.3%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.9%Flint Beat: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.5%Flint Beat: 0.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.5%Flint Beat: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.9%Mitchell Kukulka: 1.4%Flint Beat: 0.9%Unattributed Quote10.9%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.1%Flint Beat: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 1.2%Flint Beat: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.0%Flint Beat: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Mitchell Kukulka: 0.3%Flint Beat: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.4%

350 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers52%attributed speech168writer words
Selected voice

Phil Hendrix

86%flagged-word coverage
167 attributed words92% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.5 ptsWriter: 15.5%Phil Hendrix: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+0.1 ptsWriter: 11.3%Phil Hendrix: 11.4%11.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.