Author summary
⁠5%5 analyzed articles/videos2,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitchell Kukulka results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 2,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,544 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (7,922 of 8,394 authors). This Mitchell Kukulka is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Mitchell Kukulka
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠6%Mitchell Kukulka (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,544
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751005.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos