Author summary
⁠18%5 analyzed articles/videos1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Cheek results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 2,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,266 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (6,080 of 8,332 authors). This Kevin Cheek is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Kevin Cheek
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠27%Kevin Cheek (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,266
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos