Author summary
11%5 analyzed articles/videos1,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jiquanda Johnson results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,014 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,458 of 8,417 authors). This Jiquanda Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Jiquanda Johnson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
24%Jiquanda Johnson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,014
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate