Publication summary
28% 19 analyzed articles/videos 13,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Montanan results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 4,396 hits . Analysis detected 30,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,918 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 14% (473 of 548 publications). This Daily Montanan is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 65,918
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 0.9% BS Score19 analyzed articles65.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst