Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Henderson results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 544 hits . Analysis detected 2,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (6,032 of 8,522 authors). This Tim Henderson is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Tim Henderson
Author details
Total words: 5,360
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst