Author summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keila Szpaller results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 387 hits . Analysis detected 1,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,728 of 8,516 authors). This Keila Szpaller is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Keila Szpaller
Author details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst