Author summary
24% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micah Drew results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 487 hits . Analysis detected 2,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,743 of 8,741 authors). This Micah Drew is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Micah Drew
Author details
Total words: 5,728
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst