Author summary
24%2 analyzed articles/videos1,432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micah Drew results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 2,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,743 of 8,741 authors). This Micah Drew is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Micah Drew
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
35%Micah Drew (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,728
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos