Author summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amelia Twyman results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 488 hits . Analysis detected 3,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,187 of 8,522 authors). This Amelia Twyman is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Amelia Twyman
Author details
Total words: 7,864
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst