Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shauneen Miranda results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 5,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,584 of 6,171 authors). This Shauneen Miranda is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Shauneen Miranda
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
75%Shauneen Miranda (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,460
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.2%13.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 14.1%14.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.0%14.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos