Author summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelcie Moseley-Morris results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Recency Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 1,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,610 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,938 of 8,522 authors). This Kelcie Moseley-Morris is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Kelcie Moseley-Morris
Author details
Total words: 3,610
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst