Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weddings results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 3,537 hits . Analysis detected 17,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,272 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,013 of 35,866 keywords). This Weddings is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Weddings
Keyword details
Total words: 22,272
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst