STLPR0%

Longtime St. Charles prom and wedding reception hall demolished for multiyear redevelopment 22%

By Katie Grawitch0%

5/29/2026, 12:47:04 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 559 faulty-reasoning hits from 399 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.3% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,258 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the article peer group.

The Heart of St. 
Charles Banquet Center was demolished Friday to make room for the next phase of a multiyear redevelopment. 
The entrance to the site of thousands of proms, wedding receptions and other milestones came down with a crash as an excavator chomped into the side of the building. 
The building first opened as a restaurant in the 1960s before becoming the Heart of St. 
Charles in 1992. 
It closed in 2019. 
Mayor Dan Borgmeyer said the demolition is connected to the multibillion-dollar Boroughs of Riverwalk project to redevelop 5.5 miles of land along the Missouri River. 
"It's been an integral part of the community for a long, long time, and proudly so," Borgmeyer said. 
"The memories will stay. 
The building is not going to." 
The Boroughs of Riverwalk divides the riverfront into six sections. 
The Riverpointe borough, which includes the site of the former banquet center, is set aside for hotels and mixed-use development. 
The first phase of the project was completed in 2021 with the construction of a Hampton Inn & Suites to the west of the property. 
The next phase will see the construction of a Fairfield Inn to open in winter 2028 and a parking garage to support the hotels. 
Spokesperson Jamie Newell stated in a release that the final vision for the site includes another hotel and restaurant directly on the former banquet hall site. 
Newell said the new development is intended to increase lodging capacity and support future tourism along the riverfront. 
Property owner and developer Sheri Steffens said watching her longtime business crumble to make way for the hotels was surreal. 
"When you're young and going into business, (and) you're going to build something really big and exciting, you don't think, 'OK, and in 30 years I'm coming back to tear it all down again,'" Steffens said. 
"This building has served us well, but it was the moments inside that really count. 
So, as we end this next chapter, all I have to say is the best is yet to come." 
Lifelong St. 
Charles resident Jolene Garland brought her grandson to see the demolition. 
She said she remembers having her 50-year high school reunion at the site. 
"It was beautiful," Garland said. 
"It was a great place to have weddings and social events. 
So, I'm sure it'll be missed." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 19.5%Katie Grawitch: 2.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic19.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 8.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion2.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.8%Katie Grawitch: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias10.8%This article: 4.8%Katie Grawitch: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 12.3%Katie Grawitch: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias12.3%This article: 9.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Katie Grawitch: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Katie Grawitch: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Katie Grawitch: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Katie Grawitch: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.5%Katie Grawitch: 6.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion14.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.3%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal15.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.5%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection6.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 18.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…18.8%

399 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers58%attributed speech166writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Dan Borgmeyer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Dan Borgmeyer • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Dan Borgmeyer • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Dan Borgmeyer • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJamie Newell • 26 words • 100.0% coverageJamie Newell • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSheri Steffens • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSheri Steffens • 36 words • 0.0% coverageSheri Steffens • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSheri Steffens • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJolene Garland • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJolene Garland • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJolene Garland • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJolene Garland • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJolene Garland • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sheri Steffens

100%flagged-word coverage
90 attributed words39% of attributed speech47% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -29.5 ptsWriter: 29.5%Sheri Steffens: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.