Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economy & Business results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,307 hits . Analysis detected 8,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,100 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,785 of 16,562 topics). This Economy & Business is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. Economy & Business
Topic details
Total words: 10,100
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst