Departing SLDC head Otis Williams says St. Louis should focus on developing downtown and north city 67%

By Kavahn Mansouri59%

3/30/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Recency Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 1,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 741 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,254 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the article peer group.

Last May, when the St. 
Louis Development Corporation called upon Otis Williams, its former president and CEO, to step back into the role on an interim basis, Williams said he hoped to make developing in St. 
Louis a more “predictable process.” 
A year later, he believes the city has taken big steps toward doing just that. 
“The challenges are ensuring that a developer can get a fair return on investment, and that the challenges of getting projects approved if there are incentives involved is more predictable,” Williams said. 
“I can't tell you that it's all fixed.” 
Williams stepped into the role after former SLDC head Neal Richardson departed not long after Mayor Cara Spencer’s inauguration. 
Williams held the job from 2013 to 2021, when he retired. 
In 22 years with the agency, he played a part in developing many of St. 
Louis’ iconic landmarks, including the newly opened National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency campus in north St. 
Louis, Ballpark Village and Busch Stadium. 
Still, he said there’s more to do. 
He pointed toward downtown St. 
Louis and north St. 
Louis, specifically the areas impacted by the May 16, 2025, EF3 tornado, as places where the city needs to spur new development. 
SLDC announced the hiring of incoming President and CEO Stephen Westbrooks earlier this month. 
Williams’ last day as interim head of the agency was Friday. 
Williams spoke recently with St. 
Louis Public Radio economic development reporter Kavahn Mansouri about his tenure. 
The following conversation has been edited for length and clarity. 
Kavahn Mansouri: Otis, looking back at this latest tenure at SLDC, what sticks out to you as the highlights? 
Otis Williams: A great day during this tenure was actually the opening of the NGA, and I, when I retired in ‘21, I didn't think that I'd be around this to participate in the opening of that facility, you know, having spent so much time trying to get it on underway, and so I think just attending that event was really satisfying. 
But the fact that Cortex continues to do their thing. 
The Kempton hotel will be coming. 
The project is finally through the, almost through the legislative process. 
And so I think projects like that will be a signature. 
Mansouri: And you've been part of some major landmarks in St Louis, like Busch Stadium, the NGA campus, as you mentioned, and more. 
How does it feel to have had that part in St Louis' economic landscape? 
Williams: It was all about working with a lot of good people. 
You know, obviously the developer and the builders who made it all happen, but also just a number of political and staff members who just came through and made it all happen. 
And so those are all, when I see them all, I do have warm feelings about it, as those are things that will be around for a while. 
I really like what those things mean, but I would really, really like to see something very significant happen along the corridors of MLK, Page and Natural Bridge, if we can cause something very significant to happen there, I think that would be even greater than any of those signature projects that you talked about. 
Mansouri: When you were appointed to this position, you said you wanted to stay the ship and make development more predictable in St Louis. 
Can you talk about that? 
And where do you hope the city can go with that foundation? 
Williams: The good thing is, I think that the stars are beginning to align, and so working with all of the departments in the city and with the aldermen and the mayor's office, just being able to facilitate and welcome redevelopment and work with the developers who have a desire to work here in the city. 
And I think a home run is having work done all over the city, but there needs to be a real focus on what happens downtown, because it is really the signature and face of not only the city, but of the region. 
And so when I say that, I don't mean that we should not do and have a focus on north St Louis or the recovery area or south St Louis. 
I just mean that there is a need to have an intentional view of our downtown, because that is our signature location. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.6%Kavahn Mansouri: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Kavahn Mansouri: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.7%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias2.6%This article: 8.6%Kavahn Mansouri: 9.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect8.6%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 21.7%Kavahn Mansouri: 5.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias21.7%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Kavahn Mansouri: 9.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.9%This article: 10.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias10.0%This article: 3.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect10.9%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Kavahn Mansouri: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.7%Kavahn Mansouri: 9.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion5.7%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.6%Kavahn Mansouri: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.6%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 7.6%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature7.6%This article: 5.8%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division5.8%This article: 8.4%Kavahn Mansouri: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal8.4%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.5%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.5%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.3%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote7.3%This article: 8.4%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection8.4%This article: 2.6%Kavahn Mansouri: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 5.8%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination5.8%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kavahn Mansouri: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

741 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers80%attributed speech149writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Otis Williams • 7 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 31 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 32 words • 100.0% coverageOtis Williams • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageSLDC • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKavahn Mansouri • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageKavahn Mansouri • 19 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 62 words • 100.0% coverageOtis Williams • 10 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 6 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 11 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKavahn Mansouri • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKavahn Mansouri • 14 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 12 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 32 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 28 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 55 words • 0.0% coverageKavahn Mansouri • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKavahn Mansouri • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKavahn Mansouri • 12 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 56 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 43 words • 100.0% coverageOtis Williams • 30 words • 0.0% coverageOtis Williams • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Otis Williams

86%flagged-word coverage
470 attributed words79% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-8.0 ptsWriter: 14.8%Otis Williams: 6.8%6.8%Quote-first Misdirection+13.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Otis Williams: 13.2%13.2%Indoctrination+9.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Otis Williams: 9.1%9.1%Biased Writer Voice-4.8 ptsWriter: 6.7%Otis Williams: 1.9%1.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.