Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Otis Williams results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Recency Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 545 hits . Analysis detected 2,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,867 of 37,536 keywords). This Otis Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Otis Williams
Keyword details
Total words: 2,964
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst