Keyword summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 18,898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North St Louis results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 6,843 hits . Analysis detected 53,674 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,663 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (31,965 of 34,644 keywords). This North St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. North St Louis
Keyword details
Total words: 70,663
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles70.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst