Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Downtown Stl results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 798 hits . Analysis detected 4,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,215 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (27,792 of 34,832 keywords). This Downtown Stl is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Downtown Stl
Keyword details
Total words: 7,215
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst